Actor and former secretary of AMMA Ansiba Hassan he strongly encouraged his argument against fellow actors Little Tom. The Ernakulam Judicial First Class Magistrate Court accepted the criminal petition filed by Ansiba and asked the police to lodge an FIR and investigate the case based on her statement. The decision was taken by the Court after Ansiba asked for help because the police did not act on his previous complaints.
The court orders an FIR after the police refuse to register a case
This case is based on what Ansiba said to Tini Tom about the words he said, insulting and affecting all people. As English Mathrubhumi reported, Ansiba Haasan said that baseless excuses were made against him, such as calling him a “jihadi” and trying to convert Tini Tom’s driver to another religion. However, after preliminary investigation and recording of statements from the actors and staff of the Association of Malayalam Movie Artistes (AMMA), the police found that there was not enough material to file a FIR. Unhappy with the decision, Ansiba moved the court, which has now ordered the police to start a criminal investigation.
Defamation and community allegations are being investigated
Under court rules, the next step in the process is an investigation. The police have to lodge an FIR and look into all the allegations made in the complaint, including pollution and public comments. An investigation also involves gathering more evidence and taking more statements from those involved in the case.
The case draws attention in the Malayalam film industry
The development has created a lot of interest among members of the Malayalam film fraternity as Ansiba Hassan and Tini Tom are prominent figures in the industry associated with AMMA. The decision of the court is obvious in this case because now the matter has reached another stage of investigation. When the police start an investigation, the emphasis will be on results.Disclaimer: The information in this report is based on legal cases reported by a third party. The information provided represents predictions made by the parties involved and is not a guaranteed fact. The case is ongoing, and the final decision has not yet been reached. This book does not claim that what it says is true.